Thursday, December 22, 2005

Living Under Fascism

Hi all,

For those of you interested in the current political state of the union please read the sermon by Davidson Loehr at the Frist UU Church of Austin. When you are finished reading it ask yourself these questions:
What will we tell the next generation when they ask us how we allowed this to happen?
Which ones of my friends will disappear one day?
Do I have the courage to let go of my capitalist induced haze and focus my energy on making the world and this country a better place for all beings?

I don't really know how to make a difference myself, but I plan on finding out and doing something. If you have any suggestions please post them.

We should all remember that in the 1920's Berlin was one of the most free and liberal places in the world. People had no fear of joining groups that were later considered subversive and it is those membership lists that the Nazi's used to round people up.

Please feel free to link to, copy and forward or anything else you can think of to get this message out.

Living Under Fascism
Davidson Loehr
7 November 2004
First UU Church of Austin
4700 Grover Ave., Austin, TX 78756

www.austinuu.org

SERMON: Living Under Fascism

You may wonder why anyone would try to use the word “fascism” in a serious discussion of where America is today. It sounds like cheap name-calling, or melodramatic allusion to a slew of old war movies. But I am serious. I don’t mean it as name-calling at all. I mean to persuade you that the style of governing into which America has slid is most accurately described as fascism, and that the necessary implications of this fact are rightly regarded as terrifying. That’s what I am about here. And even if I don’t persuade you, I hope to raise the level of your thinking about who and where we are now, to add some nuance and perhaps some useful insights.

The word comes from the Latin word “Fasces,” denoting a bundle of sticks tied together. The individual sticks represented citizens, and the bundle represented the state. The message of this metaphor was that it was the bundle that was significant, not the individual sticks. If it sounds un-American, it’s worth knowing that the Roman Fasces appear on the wall behind the Speaker’s podium in the chamber of the US House of Representatives.

Still, it’s an unlikely word. When most people hear the word "fascism" they may think of the racism and anti-Semitism of Mussolini and Hitler. It is true that the use of force and the scapegoating of fringe groups are part of every fascism. But there was also an economic dimension of fascism, known in Europe during the 1920s and '30s as "corporatism," which was an essential ingredient of Mussolini’s and Hitler’s tyrannies. So-called corporatism was adopted in Italy and Germany during the 1930s and was held up as a model by quite a few intellectuals and policy makers in the United States and Europe.

As I mentioned a few weeks ago (in “The Corporation Will Eat Your Soul”), Fortune magazine ran a cover story on Mussolini in 1934, praising his fascism for its ability to break worker unions, disempower workers and transfer huge sums of money to those who controlled the money rather than those who earned it. Few Americans are aware of or can recall how so many Americans and Europeans viewed economic fascism as the wave of the future during the 1930s. Yet reviewing our past may help shed light on our present, and point the way to a better future. So I want to begin by looking back to the last time fascism posed a serious threat to America.

In Sinclair Lewis's 1935 novel "It Can't Happen Here," a conservative southern politician is helped to the presidency by a nationally syndicated radio talk show host. The politician - Buzz Windrip - runs his campaign on family values, the flag, and patriotism. Windrip and the talk show host portray advocates of traditional American democracy — those concerned with individual rights and freedoms — as anti-American. That was 69 years ago.

One of the most outspoken American fascists from the 1930s was economist Lawrence Dennis. In his 1936 book, The Coming American Fascism — a coming which he anticipated and cheered — Dennis declared that defenders of “18th-century Americanism” were sure to become "the laughing stock of their own countrymen." The big stumbling block to the development of economic fascism, Dennis bemoaned, was "liberal norms of law or constitutional guarantees of private rights." So it is important for us to recognize that, as an economic system, fascism was widely accepted in the 1920s and '30s, and nearly worshiped by some powerful American industrialists. And fascism has always, and explicitly, been opposed to liberalism of all kinds.

Mussolini, who helped create modern fascism, viewed liberal ideas as the enemy. "The Fascist conception of life," he wrote, "stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with the State. It is opposed to classical liberalism [which] denied the State in the name of the individual; Fascism reasserts the rights of the State as expressing the real essence of the individual." (In 1932 Mussolini wrote, with the help of Giovanni Gentile, an entry for the Italian Encyclopedia on the definition of fascism. You can read the whole entry at http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/mussolini-fascism.html) Mussolini thought it was unnatural for a government to protect individual rights: The essence of fascism, he believed, is that government should be the master, not the servant, of the people.

Still, fascism is a word that is completely foreign to most of us. We need to know what it is, and how we can know it when we see it. In an essay coyly titled “Fascism Anyone?,” Dr. Lawrence Britt, a political scientist, identifies social and political agendas common to fascist regimes. His comparisons of Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Suharto, and Pinochet yielded this list of 14 “identifying characteristics of fascism.” (The following article is from Free Inquiry magazine, Volume 23, Number 2. Read it at: http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/britt_23_2.htm)

See how familiar they sound.

1. Powerful and Continuing NationalismFascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.
2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human RightsBecause of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of “need.” The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying CauseThe people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.
4. Supremacy of the MilitaryEven when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.
5. Rampant SexismThe governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy.
6. Controlled Mass MediaSometimes the media are directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media are indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.
7. Obsession with National SecurityFear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.
8. Religion and Government are IntertwinedGovernments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.
9. Corporate Power is ProtectedThe industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.
10. Labor Power is SuppressedBecause the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the ArtsFascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts.
12. Obsession with Crime and PunishmentUnder fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations
13. Rampant Cronyism and CorruptionFascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.
14. Fraudulent ElectionsSometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.

This list will be familiar to students of political science. But it should be familiar to students of religion as well, for much of it mirrors the social and political agenda of religious fundamentalisms worldwide. It is both accurate and helpful for us to understand fundamentalism as religious fascism, and fascism as political fundamentalism. They both come from very primitive parts of us that have always been the default setting of our species: amity toward our in-group, enmity toward out-groups, hierarchical deference to alpha male figures, a powerful identification with our territory, and so forth. It is that brutal default setting that all civilizations have tried to raise us above, but it is always a fragile thing, civilization, and has to be achieved over and over and over again.

But, again, this is not America’s first encounter with fascism.

In early 1944, the New York Times asked Vice President Henry Wallace to, as Wallace noted, “write a piece answering the following questions: What is a fascist? How many fascists have we? How dangerous are they?” Vice President Wallace's answer to those questions was published in The New York Times on April 9, 1944, at the height of the war against the Axis powers of Germany and Japan. See how much you think his statements apply to our society today. “The really dangerous American fascist,” Wallace wrote, “… is the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way. The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power.” In his strongest indictment of the tide of fascism he saw rising in America, Wallace added, “They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final objective toward which all their deceit is directed is to capture political power so that, using the power of the state and the power of the market simultaneously, they may keep the common man in eternal subjection.” By these standards, a few of today’s weapons for keeping the common people in eternal subjection include NAFTA, the World Trade Organization, union-busting, cutting worker benefits while increasing CEO pay, elimination of worker benefits, security and pensions, rapacious credit card interest, and outsourcing of jobs — not to mention the largest prison system in the world.

The Perfect Storm

Our current descent into fascism came about through a kind of “Perfect Storm,” a confluence of three unrelated but mutually supportive schools of thought.
1. The first stream of thought was the imperialistic dream of the Project for the New American Century. I don’t believe anyone can understand the past four years without reading the Project for the New American Century, published in September 2000 and authored by many who have been prominent players in the Bush administrations, including Cheney, Rumsfleid, Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and Donald Kagan to name only a few. This report saw the fall of Communism as a call for America to become the military rulers of the world, to establish a new worldwide empire. They spelled out the military enhancements we would need, then noted, sadly, that these wonderful plans would take a long time, unless there could be a catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor that would let the leaders turn America into a military and militarist country. There was no clear interest in religion in this report, and no clear concern with local economic policies.
2. A second powerful stream must be credited to Pat Robertson and his Christian Reconstructionists, or Dominionists. Long dismissed by most of us as a screwball, the Dominionist style of Christianity which he has been preaching since the early 1980s is now the most powerful religious voice in the Bush administration. Katherine Yurica, who transcribed over 1300 pages of interviews from Pat Robertson’s “700 Club” shows in the 1980s, has shown how Robertson and his chosen guests consistently, openly and passionately argued that America must become a theocracy under the control of Christian Dominionists. Robertson is on record saying democracy is a terrible form of government unless it is run by his kind of Christians. He also rails constantly against taxing the rich, against public education, social programs and welfare — and prefers Deuteronomy 28 over the teachings of Jesus. He is clear that women must remain homebound as obedient servants of men, and that abortions, like homosexuals, should not be allowed. Robertson has also been clear that other kinds of Christians, including Episcopalians and Presbyterians, are enemies of Christ. (The Yurica Report. Search under this name, or for “Despoiling America” by Katherine Yurica on the internet.)
3. The third major component of this Perfect Storm has been the desire of very wealthy Americans and corporate CEOs for a plutocracy that will favor profits by the very rich and disempowerment of the vast majority of American workers, the destruction of workers’ unions, and the alliance of government to help achieve these greedy goals. It is a condition some have called socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor, and which others recognize as a reincarnation of Social Darwinism. This strain of thought has been present throughout American history. Seventy years ago, they tried to finance a military coup to replace Franklin Delano Roosevelt and establish General Smedley Butler as a fascist dictator in 1934. Fortunately, the picked a general who really was a patriot; he refused, reported the scheme, and spoke and wrote about it. As Canadian law professor Joel Bakan wrote in the book and movie “The Corporation,” they have now achieved their coup without firing a shot. Our plutocrats have had no particular interest in religion. Their global interests are with an imperialist empire, and their domestic goals are in undoing all the New Deal reforms of Franklin Delano Roosevelt that enabled the rise of America’s middle class after WWII.

Another ill wind in this Perfect Storm is more important than its crudity might suggest: it was President Clinton’s sleazy sex with a young but eager intern in the White House. This incident, and Clinton’s equally sleazy lying about it, focused the certainties of conservatives on the fact that “liberals” had neither moral compass nor moral concern, and therefore represented a dangerous threat to the moral fiber of America. While the effects of this may be hard to quantify, I think they were profound.

These “storm” components have no necessary connection, and come from different groups of thinkers, many of whom wouldn’t even like one another. But together, they form a nearly complete web of command and control, which has finally gained control of America and, they hope, of the world.

What’s coming

When all fascisms exhibit the same social and political agendas (the 14 points listed by Britt), then it is not hard to predict where a new fascist uprising will lead. And it is not hard. The actions of fascists and the social and political effects of fascism and fundamentalism are clear and sobering. Here is some of what’s coming, what will be happening in our country in the next few years: The theft of all social security funds, to be transferred to those who control money, and the increasing destitution of all those dependent on social security and social welfare programs. Rising numbers of uninsured people in this country that already has the highest percentage of citizens without health insurance in the developed world. Increased loss of funding for public education combined with increased support for vouchers, urging Americans to entrust their children’s education to Christian schools. More restrictions on civil liberties as America is turned into the police state necessary for fascism to work. Withdrawal of virtually all funding for National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System. At their best, these media sometimes encourage critical questioning, so they are correctly seen as enemies of the state’s official stories. The reinstatement of a draft, from which the children of privileged parents will again be mostly exempt, leaving our poorest children to fight and die in wars of imperialism and greed that could never benefit them anyway. (That was my one-sentence Veterans’ Day sermon for this year.)More imperialistic invasions: of Iran and others, and the construction of a huge permanent embassy in Iraq. More restrictions on speech, under the flag of national security. Control of the internet to remove or cripple it as an instrument of free communication that is exempt from government control. This will be presented as a necessary anti-terrorist measure. Efforts to remove the tax-exempt status of churches like this one, and to characterize them as anti-American.Tighter control of the editorial bias of almost all media, and demonization of the few media they are unable to control – the New York Times, for instance. Continued outsourcing of jobs, including more white-collar jobs, to produce greater profits for those who control the money and direct the society, while simultaneously reducing America’s workers to a more desperate and powerless status. Moves in the banking industry to make it impossible for an increasing number of Americans to own their homes. As they did in the 1930s, those who control the money know that it is to their advantage and profit to keep others renting rather than owning. Criminalization of those who protest, as un-American, with arrests, detentions and harassment increasing. We already have a higher percentage of our citizens in prison than any other country in the world. That percentage will increase. In the near future, it will be illegal or at least dangerous to say the things I have said here this morning. In the fascist story, these things are un-American. In the real history of a democratic America, they were seen as profoundly patriotic, as the kind of critical questions that kept the American spirit alive — the kind of questions, incidentally, that our media were supposed to be pressing. Can these schemes work? I don’t think so. I think they are murderous, rapacious and insane. But I don’t know. Maybe they can. Similar schemes have worked in countries like Chile, where a democracy in which over 90% voted has been reduced to one in which only about 20% vote because they say, as Americans are learning to say, that it no longer matters who you vote for.

Hope

In the meantime, is there any hope, or do we just band together like lemmings and dive off a cliff? Yes, there is always hope, though at times it is more hidden, as it is now. As some critics are now saying, and as I have been preaching and writing for almost twenty years, America’s liberals need to grow beyond political liberalism, with its often self-absorbed focus on individual rights to the exclusion of individual responsibilities to the larger society. Liberals will have to construct a more complete vision with moral and religious grounding. That does not mean confessional Christianity. It means the legitimate heir to Christianity. Such a legitimate heir need not be a religion, though it must have clear moral power, and be able to attract the minds and hearts of a voting majority of Americans. And the new liberal vision must be larger than that of the conservative religious vision that will be appointing judges, writing laws and bending the cultural norms toward hatred and exclusion for the foreseeable future. The conservatives deserve a lot of admiration. They have spent the last thirty years studying American politics, forming their vision and learning how to gain control in the political system. And it worked; they have won. Even if liberals can develop a bigger vision, they still have all that time-consuming work to do. It won’t be fast. It isn’t even clear that liberals will be willing to do it; they may instead prefer to go down with the ship they’re used to. One man who has been tireless in his investigations and critiques of America’s slide into fascism is Michael C. Ruppert, whose postings usually read as though he is wound way too tight. But he offers four pieces of advice about what we can do now, and they seem reality-based enough to pass on to you. This is America; they’re all about money:First, he says you should get out of debt. Second is to spend your money and time on things that give you energy and provide you with useful information. Third is to stop spending a penny with major banks, news media and corporations that feed you lies and leave you angry and exhausted. And fourth is to learn how money works and use it like a (political) weapon — as he predicts the rest of the world will be doing against us. (from http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/110504_snap_out.shtml) That’s advice written this week. Another bit of advice comes from sixty years ago, from Roosevelt’s Vice President, Henry Wallace. Wallace said, “Democracy, to crush fascism internally, must...develop the ability to keep people fully employed and at the same time balance the budget. It must put human beings first and dollars second. It must appeal to reason and decency and not to violence and deceit. We must not tolerate oppressive government or industrial oligarchy in the form of monopolies and cartels.” Still another way to understand fascism is as a kind of colonization. A simple definition of “colonization” is that it takes people’s stories away, and assigns them supportive roles in stories that empower others at their expense. When you are taxed to support a government that uses you as a means to serve the ends of others, you are — ironically — in a state of taxation without representation. That’s where this country started, and it’s where we are now. I don’t know the next step. I’m not a political activist; I’m only a preacher. But whatever you do, whatever we do, I hope that we can remember some very basic things that I think of as eternally true. One is that the vast majority of people are good decent people who mean and do as well as they know how. Very few people are evil, though some are. But we all live in families where some of our blood relatives support things we hate. I believe they mean well, and the way to rebuild broken bridges is through greater understanding, compassion, and a reality-based story that is more inclusive and empowering for the vast majority of us. Those who want to live in a reality-based story rather than as serfs in an ideology designed to transfer power, possibility and hope to a small ruling elite have much long and hard work to do, individually and collectively. It will not be either easy or quick. But we will do it. We will go forward in hope and in courage. Let us seek that better path, and find the courage to take it — step, by step, by step.

Friday, December 16, 2005

My Favorite Meditation


I meditate. In the school of meditation I practice there are 21 different meditations that are practiced in a cycle that build upon each other. The initial contemplations, to attain our point of single minded focus, go from pretty simple "If we use our human life to accomplish spiritual realizations, it becomes immensely meaningful" to rather complex "My body is empty of true, or inherent, existence because, when I search for it, it disappears like a mirage".

My favorite meditation and the one that helps me the most in my day to day life is a meditation on increasing affectionate love for all. This meditation has taken a lot of the anger out of my life and replaced it with compassion. As you may or may not know most men express depression through anger, so really this meditation has taken most of the depression out of my life. That is the reason I would like to share it.

Settle in a comfortable position and bring your awareness to your body. Scan through your body and find any points of tension and let them go. Gather all your worries together in a bag and place them outside the door. Focus your attention on your breath single pointedly. With each in breath believe that it is your first breath. As you focus on your breath imagine that as you breath out all your worries, tensions, problems, anger and depression are released in the form of dark smoke that drifts off. When you feel ready, imagine that as you breath in you breath in positive energy in the form of bright white light. Fill you mind and body with this light. Then bring to your mind someone who you have great affectionate love for, for many this would be your Mother. Send that loving energy to your Mother and learn what it feels like to release that love. Then widen the circle a bit and include other family members, friends. Then widen the circle a bit and include acquaintances or people you just have seen and feel neutral about. Then, when you are able, widen the circle to include the people you don't particuarly like, then the people you really don't like. At some point widen the circle to include all living beings. When you are able to get to this point, just stay there. When you are done dedicate your meditation to the realization of peace and love for all those living beings.

Do this meditation for a while and the love you imagine will actually start to happen.

May everyone be happy,
May everyone be free from misery,
May no one ever be seperated from their happiness,
May everyone have equanimity, free from hatred and attachment.

My favorite prayer. It is called "Generating the four immeasurables". It is my wish for the world.

Peace

Thursday, December 15, 2005

Arnold the Truffle Pig


I came across one of those silly websites about all the horrible attributes of the French and I have decided I want to be French. Exactly the opposite of the author's intention I suppose. I want to sit in cafes and sip appertifs. I want to smoke stinky cigarettes and talk bad about Americans, with their oversized cars and conspicuous consumption. I want to take my Standard Poodle Sage with me when I go out to eat or to the market. I would actually like to be able to go to the market instead of the Wal-Mart Supercenter (Grand Marche?). I want to be able to eat chocolate croissants for breakfast, have a 4 course lunch and a delightful dinner with family and friends all in the haze of fabulous red wine and stay skinny. I want to go looking for truffles with my pig, I would name him arnold. I want to go on vacation for the whole month of August just because it is too damn hot in the city. I am jealous that Joie de Vivre has no direct english translation, but I am pretty sure it is about living life to the fullest and not worrying to much about what will happen tomorrow.

And best of all- If the politicians get out of hand off with their heads!

Heres to the French and all their no going to war with Iraq sensibilities!

Monday, December 12, 2005

Guess the Author

I've been away for way too long now. Kind of been going through a down period and did not have much of a life to share, but things seem to be looking better these days. I'm trying to get in touch with my inner Buddha and seem to be making some progress, more on that in later blogs. I came across this quote the other day and found it quite disturbing.

"We establish no religion in this country, we command no worship, we mandate no belief, nor will we ever. Church and state are, and must remain, separate. All are free to believe or not believe, all are free to practice a faith or not, and those who believe are free, and should be free, to speak of and act on their belief. At the same time that our Constitution prohibits state establishment of religion, it protects the free exercise of all religions. And walking this fine line requires government to be strictly neutral."

Sounded like a centrist Democrat to me, but this is a actually a quote by Ronald Reagan, the grand poo-bah of all right wing Republicans. Its amazing how far right our Country has swung in the last few decades and even scarier to think where we may be, if things keep going the way they are, in a few more decades.

Thursday, August 11, 2005

Makes ya go Om.....


In my never ending quest to find out why I am here I came across the following Hindu myth, which was so stunning to me, I have to share it.

Markandeya was not born in our world. He was actually born in the last world cycle, Hindu's believe that the world has begun and ended many times.

One day Markandeya noticed his parents were extremely upset. When he asked what was wrong, his father tearfully admitted that when Markandeya was born, the village astrologer predicted the boy would die on this sixteenth birthday.

Well that very day was his sixteenth birthday. Rather upset, Markandeya ran to the temple and threw his arms around the image of the god Shiva, begging him for protection.

At that very moment the god of death entered the temple, ready to slip the noose around Markandeya's neck and drag him out of his body. But just as Death reached for the young boy, Shiva materialized in front of them, furious that Death would dare approach a devotee while he was worshipping him. Death was so terrified he ran away and never dared approach Markandeya again.

That was fine for the time being, but after a few billion years, it go to be a problem. The sun eventually flickered out of existence, the Earth passed away, and Markandeya floated around in empty space for eons. Finally the Earth reshaped itself back into existence, and Markandea was able to walk on terra firma once more. He reported what he'd experienced between worlds to anyone who asked.

What happens when the solar system dies, he explained, is that the Sun slowly turns red and expands to many times its present size. The surface of the earth eventually becomes so hot, no living thing can survive, and the planet becomes as bare as a turtle's back. The Sun explodes, emitting a burning wind that blasts the planets to ashes.

This extremely old Hindu myth describes the end of the world exactly as astrophysicists predict it will in fact occur. Carl Sagan once noted that the parallels between Hindu teachings and new scientific findings about the evolution of the universe are "astonishing coincidences". I agree.

Thursday, August 04, 2005

Maybe Oblivious would be a good thing.

For some reason I've been either blessed or cursed, depending on the situation, with the ability to pick up on people's moods. I can tell as soon as someone walks into my house or office if they are happy, sad, mad, angry, you name it I can tell. The problem is sometimes it gets on me. I can be in a happy, bluebird singing, not a care in the world mood and someone can bring in the angry, put upon, dirge chanting mood and it crawls across the floor, drags itself up my leg and gets right in my head. I've tried telling myself that its not my mood so they can keep it. I've tried telling myself that I have the invisible forcefield and the cone of silence and it can't get in. I've tried telling myself that some people like to miserable and so I should be happy that they are miserable. It's a lot harder to go about your happy mood than you think.

Some people are oblivious to other peoples moods and it makes the angry people mad at them. Of course, that doesn't matter either because they are oblivious to the fact that the angry people are mad at them for not picking up on their mood and begging them to give the bad mood to them. I'm jealous of those people! Of course it does get them in trouble from time to time. The passive-aggressives think you are ignoring them or don't understand them. Others think you have no sympathy for their pain as the oblivious go through their life singing and smiling. I wish I was oblivious too. I wish when someone came around me in a bad mood, my good mood would bounce across the floor and jump on their head. That rarely happens, but I'm going to work on making it happen more. Who ever said that someone's anger was more important than my happiness? If someone did say it I'm sure it was an angry person and I hope someone's happiness bounced upside their head until they shut up.

Tuesday, July 19, 2005

When did shopping become so important?

So, the other day my partner and I were out shopping and I thought to myself; David why are you always shopping? Then I realized, we've all been tricked. We thought "1984" and "Brave New World" were just crazy projections about what could happen to us, but the thing is it DID happen, just in a different way. We spend our lives going to work so we can go to the mall and buy stuff and then our neighbor goes to work more than we do, so we have to go to work more so we can buy the same stuff they buy. The whole time we are busy looking at new sheets that are 5,000,000 count or hot tubs that have a built in tv, dvd player and surround sound, we have soldiers around the world killing and torturing so the U.S. can have all the oil. We don't just want some of the oil, we want it all. We do not want to think about the day that all the oil is gone and our Hot Tub with tv, dvd player and surround sound is now our wash tub and we have to go drag our 5,000,000 count sheets to it once a week to keep them clean. We don't want to think about where our food comes from because what will we do without strawberries in the dead of winter. We don't want to think about all the crap we dump in our lakes and streams, but we will when water is not in nice clean plastic bottles at the Kroger. The thing is we don't want to think about any of that and we don't have to! Someone else is doing all the thinking for you. All you need to do is go to work and go to the mall and watch some reality tv. But don't think about reality, I mean the real reality, its scary.